So today is the day we are hearing that Trump is supposed to dazzle us with his “gunsense” law “package.” A term right from the Brady Center and Moms Demand propaganda playbook. It’s bi-partisan, so that means really bad . Meanwhile every other democrat wants confiscation at the least.
August gun sales were up 15% thanks to Democrats’ totalitarian demands for mandatory buybacks. Those
who bought guns were Americans seeking self-protection and with deep
concerns that President Donald Trump is on board with gun control.
Adjusted for sales, the NSSF industry group said that August FBI background checks for sales surged 15.2% over August 2018. The adjusted August number was second only to August 2016 during the heated presidential election. It’s become evident that gun control authoritarians are the best gun salespeople on the planet.
Trump’s rhetoric on guns and his apparent desire to curb the gun
rights of innocent people is likely also playing a role in the increase
in gun sales. The new surge came in the wake of heightened pressure for
gun control, sales bans on “military-style rifles,” limits on ammo, and a
slew of democrats saying they will take guns at the end of a gun, but
Justin Anderson, the marketing director for Hyatt Guns in Charlotte, North Carolina, one of the nation’s largest sellers, said fears of a liberal gun grab and a drive for self-protection are pushing sales higher.
“As we’ve seen in the past, the recent publicizing of mass shootings
has fueled people’s concerns about their personal safety. We are seeing
many first-time gun buyers, and our concealed carry classes are booking
up quickly,” said Anderson.
“Political figures talking about gun bans and confiscation is also
starting to figure into sales. We’ve seen a slight uptick in the sale of
tactical rifles as a result,” he added. –Washington Examiner
Democrats continue to prove themselves to be the best people to drive up gun sales.
They are literally making their goal of an enslaved populace harder by
spewing propaganda seconds after a mass shooting. It looks like innocent
people don’t like being told they aren’t allowed to protect themselves
and considering the second amendment was written to protect Americans
from tyrants, it makes sense that democrats want it gone, while free people stock up.
First is that Colt is going to stop selling rifles to civilians. Dealers are using this to push up damage, and the Colt haters are loving it.
Of course, it couldn’t possible be that Colt has a massive over seas order they are focusing, and as soon as they fill it, it will be back to normal on sale.
But, that doesn’t fit the narrative that people want to hear.
As for narrative, the next rumor is a second hand report of a second hand report that Trump is going to make a big announcement on guns tomorrow. Some claiming it will be universal background checks, or a magazine ban, etc.
True or false, might be worth selling a message to your congressional critters to tell them where to stand on the issue.
Newest rumor is that it was a RSR employee who started spreading the Colt rumor and that they have been fired for it.
It’s that time of year again when we all look back at the events of 9-11-2001. I think I have told this story before but, I’m going to tell it again. I watched it happen live about 10 minutes after the first jet hit. I was at work at a big gunstore/sporting good/pawn watching it on a big screen tv over in WV. One thing I clearly recall is all the guys walking in to get their bows worked on or arrows made. They would glance at the TV news footage, and barely care. Getting that bow ready for bow season in WV meant more to them.
Over the years since the Gov has destroyed our freedoms in the name of safety and the forever wars rage on and on, I often think on how these same people are the ones that just shrug their shoulders and let all this stuff happen without a whimper.
After the attack they used to say “don’t do this or stop doing that or the terrorists win. Yea, Well. People get arrested for saying mean things online.The gov spies on everything we do and is trying it’s best to disarm us. It brings in the people who want us dead and half the country hates the other half with the heat of thermite burning. They did win.
The 9/11 attacks not only killed thousands of Americans, they also led to America’s forever wars
in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Iran, and elsewhere, which
have brought about the deaths of thousands of other Americans and
millions of foreigners. But the 9/11 attacks did more than that. They
also fortified the U.S. government as a national-security state, which
solidified the destruction of the freedom of the American people.
What is a national-security state? It is a type of
governmental structure that has an enormous, permanent
military-intelligence establishment. In the case of the United States,
that means the Pentagon, the vast military-industrial complex, foreign
military bases, the CIA, and the NSA. It also means power — enormous
power, not only for the overall government, but also within the
governmental structure itself. To place things in a general context,
Egypt is a national-security state. So are China, Cuba, and Russia. And
the United States.
It wasn’t always that way. America was founded as a
limited-government republic, which is the opposite of a
national-security state. No Pentagon, no vast military-industrial complex, no foreign military bases, no CIA, and NSA. Just a relatively small army.
That’s the way the Framers and our American ancestors wanted it. The
last thing they wanted was the type of governmental structure under
which we Americans live today. In fact, if the proponents of the
Constitution had said to the American people after the Constitutional
Convention that the Constitution was going to bring into existence a
national-security state, they would have died laughing, thinking it was a
big joke. Once they had realized that it wasn’t a joke, they would have
summarily rejected the deal and continued operating under the Articles
of Confederation, a third type of governmental system under which the
federal government’s powers were so few and weak that the federal
government hadn’t even been given the power to tax.
The post-World World II revolution
The revolutionary change occurred after World War II.
Although the war against Nazi Germany had just ended in victory, U.S.
officials told Americans that, unfortunately, they could not rest. That
was because, they said, the U.S. now faced a foe that was arguable more
dangerous than Nazi Germany. That foe was the Soviet Union, which,
ironically, had served as America’s partner and ally during the war.
U.S. officials maintained that America now faced a vast post-war
communist conspiracy to take over the world, including the United
States, one that was based in Moscow, Russia. (Yes, that Russia!)
U.S. officials said that the only way to prevent this conspiracy from
succeeding was to convert the U.S. government to the same type of
governmental system that the Soviets had, which was a national-security
state. Continuing as a limited-government republic, they said,
would almost certainly result in defeat for America and a communist
takeover of our nation.
That’s how we ended up with a national-security state type of
governmental system, along with all of the dark-side powers that come
with it. Assassination. Kidnappings. Torture. Regime-change operations.
Sanctions. Embargoes. Invasions. Wars of aggression. Occupations. Coups.
Secret surveillance. Indefinite detention. Secret prison camps.
Military tribunals. Denial of due process of law. Out of control federal
spending and debt, in large part owing to ever-increasing budgets for
the national-security establishment. In other words, all of the things
that one would have expected from the Soviet Union were now part and
parcel of the “arsenal of freedom” wielded by the Pentagon, the CIA, and
Never mind that none of this was authorized by the Constitution, the
charter that called the federal government into existence. U.S.
officials maintained that the Constitution was not a “suicide pact.”
Continuing to follow it meant certain defeat at the hands of the Reds,
they said. It was necessary to abandon constitutional niceties, they
maintained, to save America.
Implicit in all the Cold War hoopla was that if the Cold War
were ever to end, Americans could have their limited-government republic
back. Of course, U.S. officials never thought for a moment that that
would happen. The national-security state was a racket that was supposed to go on forever.
But then in 1989, the racket suddenly and unexpectedly came to an abrupt end. Financially
broke and uninterested in continuing the Cold War, the Soviet Union
declared an end to it, dismantled itself, and brought Soviet troops home
from East Germany and Eastern Europe.
Interventionism and a new official enemy
That should have resulted in the restoration of America’s
limited-government republic, but it didn’t. Having lost its official
Cold War enemy, the U.S. national-security establishment found a new one
by going into the Middle East and embarking on a killing spree,
especially in Iraq, where it killed hundreds of thousands of people from
1991 through 2003. The victims including Iraqi children, hundreds of
thousands of them. When US Ambassador to the UN under the Bill Clinton
regime, Madeleine Albright, was asked by “Sixty Minutes” whether the
deaths of half-a-million Iraqi children were “worth it,” she responded
that while the issue was a hard one, the deaths were in fact “worth it.”
By “it,” she meant regime change in Iraq.
Not surprisingly, the U.S. mass killing of Iraqis, along with
its decision to station U.S. troops near the Muslim religion’s holiest
lands, along with the unconditional military support of the Israeli
government, led to terrorist retaliation, beginning with the
1993 attack on the World Trade Center, the attack on the USS Cole, the
attacks on the U.S. embassies in East Africa, and then the 9/11 attacks.
The 9/11 attacks then led to the invasions of Afghanistan and
Iraq, followed by the interventions in Syria, Libya, Yemen, and
elsewhere, which necessarily entailed a fortification and strengthening
of America’s national-security state form of governmental structure.
They also led to the Patriot Act, which eviscerated the Fourth Amendment
as well as to a formalized assassination program, including the power
to assassinate Americans … to torture people, including Americans … to
indefinitely detain American citizens and others as “enemy combatants”
in the forever “war on terrorism” … to conduct secretive surveillance
schemes over the American people and others … and to conduct intrusive
searches at airports through the TSA … to impose more deadly sanctions
and embargoes on foreign citizens … and to initate more coups and other
It all adds up to the destruction of American liberty. There
is only one way to get our freedom back: the dismantling of the
national-security state and the restoration of a limited-government
The name of the picture above is, “CarbinePerfection001.jpg”. Among the many accessories this gun wears, is a Redi-Mag.
What’s a Redi-Mag? It is a magazine holder that you clamp to the side of your gun. It is like having a second mag well. When you drop the first mag, you then use the mag on the left side of the gun to reload.
There are several version of the Redi-Mag, and there was apparently enough demand that Blue Force Gear offered a modified version of it (now discontinued). Older models have been discontinued and replaced with a lighter machined aluminum version. Most Redi-Mag mag holders had a lever to release the magazine in the Redi-Mag, but there was a model that was slaved to the rifle magazine release. When you would need to reload, you would grab the mag in the Redi-Mag with your left hand, hit the mag release to button to drop the mag in the gun and release the mag in the Redi-Mag. Then you would reload as normal.
Never been done before, right?
Oh wait, it pretty much fills the same niche as a mag coupler. Unlike a mag coupler, you jettison the spent mag, and have the option of putting a replacement magazine in the now empty Redi-Mag.
Now let’s take a trip back in time.
It is 2008ish. Most all commercial AR15s come with heavy barrels. We are installing heavy quad-rails, lights, lasers, vertical forward grips, and optics. Our guns have a huge increase in performance than the older slick iron sighted rifles, but our guns have massively grown in weight and bulk. Instead of carrying a 6-7 pound rifle or carbine, we are carrying 9+ pound railed mess of tactical gear. A great increase of capability at the cost of weight.
So the idea of slapping on a half pound accessory that is suppose to make you faster was not exactly disliked. Then adding another pound of loaded magazine was not considered terrible.
Especially when you had folks like Tarvis Haley and Larry Vickers pushing the product.
Look at that gun above. Two optics, light, laser, silencer, redimag, you have one heavy gun there.
The Redi-Mag was most often recommend for police officers. The idea being that often when they grabbed their patrol carbine they did not grab extra ammo, or a chest rig, etc. Having a Redi-Mag meant that they would have a reload right there on the rifle. Sort of like a side saddle on a shotgun.
So where are all these Redi-Mags?
I was noticing that I haven’t seen a rifle with a Redimag for a long time now.
I guess people don’t want to spend 100-200 dollars to slap a pound and a half on the side of their rifle now.
Nowadays more rifles are coming with lighter weight barrels, light weight free float tubes, and our optics have gotten smaller and lighter. We don’t want another pound a half on our guns slowing down how fast we can swing them from target to target.