On the AR15.com forums there is some discussion about the Canadian version of the M16 family of weapons. A poster by the name of RebelRouser posted this info in a thread about the C7 rifle.
I apologize for not answering sooner. I‘m afraid I have been avoiding the alligators chewing on my ankles to take care of the ones feeding higher up.
To answer your questions as presented:
The effective range published does not have much to do with the barrel but is an infantry doctrine distance to do with the whole system including the man, sights, weapon ammunition and expected employment. So when you see effective range, it is almost always a subjective assessment of the system capability derived by the user instructor (CTC) and rifle requirements office (DLR), usually before the weapon is even bought. In the case of the C7 it included iron sights and was extended (I think) when the C79 sight and the C7A1 came along. The reference to the rifles origins (M16A1E1) is in reference to the sight option first chosen by the CF. The heavy front profile, 1 turn in 7inch barrel is definitely M16A2. As is the cartridge deflector, handguards and many other changes.
Now lets talk barrels:
The C7 barrel is not the same as any M16 barrel except for the exterior profile which is M16A2. The Material is to a formula developed here in Diemaco (under Gov‘t contract) so that the entire bore and chamber configuration can be integrally formed in one operation on a rotary hammer forge. This process produces a barrel that is much stronger than the US M16A2 barrel. The bore dimensions were developed to fire C77 ammunition, (Chamber, bullet lead, diameters) the bore has dimensional reduction as the bullet moves forward (squeeze) to increase life and accuracy. The bore is plated with harder chrome than the M16. This allows greater wear life (2 to 3 times M16) and lets us machine C9 barrels from the same barrel blank. The SFW was recently tested and purchased by the UK special forces and won in competition against the Swiss SIG series rifles and the H&K G36 rifle. This barrel is now in use by the Special Forces in five countries and the US Navy Seals have expressed interest in putting them in the M4 Carbines that they have.
We have just completed a C8 Carbine upgrade program for Canada which is a new barrel with an improved chamber and stronger extractor spring assembly and a weaker ejector spring. These are the same internal configuration as our very successful SFW barrel.
The C7 rifle and C8 Carbine is made under license with a Tech Data Package provided by Colt to the Canadian Gov‘t. Diemaco reviewed the design and made about 150 changes to the drawing package before Canadian production. These are to numerous to mention her but include things like materials and processes as well as a different barrel configuration and manufacturing processes.
The improved handguard we designed here after CWO John Ginn kept beating the Colt version off the weapon on the parade square. You probably can‘t tell from the outside but if the you take the handguard off, you will notice two types. The improved version has two large ribs under the heat shield and three interlocking ribs on either edge as well as different material. These were introduced late in the program so they had to be interchangable and be a good match with the old handguard.
Another change you may notice is the small diameter front sight post that we developed when soldiers complained that the US large square one actually obscured the target at ranges of 300 and greater.
I hope this helps you with the discussion and thank you for your interest in the C7.
Product Engineering Dept.
Diemaco a division of Heroux- Devtek
Please note: Any opinions expressed or implied in this email are personal are not necessarily those of Heroux Devtek or Diemaco
In keeping with our opening up for submissions from guest writers, from other countries, today we have a review of a vest/carrier from Janet Chan. Janet has her own facebook and forum where she reviews tactical products for everyone. Today she has written a review of a South Korean ( ROK) Police Tactical Plate Carrier with its supplemental pouches and gear. The vest is currently used by the South Korean police force SWAT teams and is popular around the area with Paintball, Airsoft and sabage players.
By Janet Chan
I was in Korea for vocation the last 2 weeks, and by a chance, I got a PeaceMaker Vest from one of my Korean friends” Mr. Bin Chang”. A big THANKS to him, he is a really kind and mindful person. He gave me the Vest with the full amount of accessories. I’ve made a detail review for this product. The Vest is made of Cordura 500D water repellent material with Mesh lining. Shoulder strap comes with abrasion resist material and detachable cushion pads for more comfort and help with weight
I found that the vest is really functional with many practical Magazine pouches, utilitiy pouches, bags etc. It is a good comfortable fit for user even with fully loaded gear. If you prefer something handy, all pouches and magazine holders can be detached. but size is little too big for female. For Male, I think this is really good and looks good as well. I also learn that Korea S.W.A.T team is currently using the PEACEMAKER Tactical plate carrier as well and clearly it is set up for police and urban operations.
Brand name : PEACE MAKER (Korea)
Material : Cordura 500D (WaterProof)
Lining : Mesh
On Front :
Three Magazine Pouches ( triple shingle )with adjustable String bungee closures. It will fit for M4, AR/M16, SCAR, AUG or AKs
Two Magazine Pouches with velcro closure made for Hand Gun Magazines. the pouches will fit single or double stack magazines for semi auto pistols. The top front of the vest is covered with PALS webbing and soft velcro for attaching patches or IR tabs etc. The inside cut is made to hold the rifle plates made to the same cut as the SAPI/ ESAPI style and allows for easier movement of the arms and shoulders when shooting,
On Shoulder :
Cushion Pad with Loops : For Radio Antena , Map that can be threaded to so they are secured and out of the way and not sticking in your face or catching on anything around you.
The pouches have the versatility for a variety of rifle magazines as said above. The carrier portion looks the size to hold small to medium ESAPI plates and soft armor for protection. The sides will also hold soft armor or be able to attach side ESAPI’s via the PALS webbing.
The vest closes via velcro in the front in the same manner of plate carriers of this type, much liek the TAG Banshee or any like it.
On the right (Outer) sections of the cumber bun :
One Utility Pouch/ General purpose with Zipper opening
One Magazine Pouch with bungee string and button closure : fit for Hand Gun Magazine
On Wearer Right (Inner) :
Mesh Side Bag
On Wearer Left (Outer) :
One Bigger Size Utility Pouch with Zipper Opening
One Magazine Pouch with string and button closure : fit for Hand Gun Magazine
On Wearer Left (Inner) :
Mesh Side Bag
On Back :
One Bigger Size Utility Pouch with Buckle Closure. This pouch can be used for a small assault pack or more likely it was intended to hold a gas mask. The pouch can hold water, rain jacket or any support gear you may need. The rear of the cumber bun is the typical adjustable model with bungee cord to adjust it for size and fit. This is a flexible system though not always the fastest or most quite.
Where to Buy :
You can read more from Janet by following her links below.
A couple of weekends ago I was at the range testing out my new Surefire 762 suppressor. I ended up doing more chatting than shooting as I answered a great deal of questions about obtaining NFA items (Silencers, Machine Guns, Destructive Devices, Short Barreled Rifles, Short Barreled Shotguns, Any Other Weapons(AOW), etc)
Two common misconceptions I hear are:
1. “NFA items are illegal.” Wrong. In many places you can own machine guns, silencers, destructive devices, etc.
2. “You need to be a Class 3 Dealer to own NFA item.” Once again, wrong, you pay a tax stamp to own a “Title 2″ item. Class 3 is the type of dealer to sell these title 2 items.
There are some hoops you have to jump through to get a NFA item. The first time you buy something that is Title 2 it may be daunting. However while the process can be long, it isn’t actually that horrible.
I’ve only owned Silencers and Short Barreled Rifles.
On silencers, they are awesome! If you want one, get one.
A couple of suggestions. Don’t try to go cheap. What you buy you are stuck with. Find the suppressor that best fits your needs and get that one. Figure out what your priorities are. Some cans are smaller and lighter, but then they are louder(like my Surefire 7.62 SOCOM mini pictured above). Some cans are very quiet, but rather large and heavy. The lightest cans tend to be titanium, which makes them very expensive. Figure out your needs in order, and buy the can that fits those. For me, it is, “Minimal point of impact shift, mounting system, size/weight, suppression, cost” What you need or want may be a different order. Then, if possible, listen to what the can you want sounds like in person before you buy it. Know what type of performance you will get, so your not surprised or disappointed when you get it.
One last note, sometimes sticklers say that there is no such thing is a silencer, only “suppressors” because it doesn’t completely silence a firearm. Well my paperwork says I own a “silencer”, so I own a silencer.
I really like short barreled rifles. I have two SBR AR15s, with a Colt 6945 that I am waiting on. I had a short AK in the past, but I sold that.
The SBR AR15 is really a wonderful versatile gun. You can easily change calibers, barrel lengths, configuration, etc. However nows with accessories like the “Pistol Stabilizing Brace” I recommend to people to buy an AR15 pistol instead of a SBR. There is no paperwork, you can easily sell it if you don’t like it.
If your not familiar with the “Stabilizing Brace” here is a video of Jerry Miculek playing around with a couple
Having a not-stock like that doesn’t stop the pistol from being a pistol, so you have most all the benefits of a SBR minus the paperwork. But if you truly want a SBR, go get it.
The wait after you submit your NFA paperwork to the ATF really sucks. If you never submit your paperwork, you will never get that NFA item. I have had people tell me that they have filled out a form 1 to SBR a gun, but haven’t mailed them in because they don’t want to wait. When I ask when they filled out the forms they give me a reply like, “Oh, about a year ago.” Had they mailed in the form, they would have had their SBR by now.
I am not a fan of bullpups. In fact, you could say I hate the things. But, there is an exception to every rule and now, my exception is the AUG. Since the 80s, I have always admired the AUG as a cool exotic weapon that was hard to get my paws on here and it only got harder to find one until recently. Then, it just became hard to get a good one. Over the weekend, my friend and one of Looseorunds guest writers brought in his new Steyr AUGA3 for us to use and abuse until our heats became intend. And while the AUG is not perfect, it lived up to be everything I hoped it would be.
The new AUGA3 is not a knock off or cheap copy, but a real Steyr AUG. The barrel is made by FN with what is said to be a 1/9 twist. But recent investigation has shown the barrel twist to be closer to a 1/8.5. I will talk more on that in a bit. The gun uses the original magazine pattern, but lacks the original low powered optic. Instead it comes with the infinitely more useful railed top.
The gun also has a side mounted rail for adding accessories you may need or want to add. We mounted the excellent Aimpoint T-1 in a Laure mount, and the nice compact Surefire X300 on the side rail. This gave a very compact and handy general purpose package. One of the down sides to the AUG is the slight difficulty of being able to activate some of the on/off switches to weapons lights. This can be over come, but every solution we came up with never really seemed to be idea in my opinion, As it stands now, the light would have to be turned constant on/off when needed. I am sure some one else will eventually come up with a good solution to this.
As can be seen in the picture above, the top rail still has plenty of space for NOD mounting and even has room left over for a IR/visible laser that an be mounted in front, or a set of BUIS. All of this adds not weight to the rifle that makes the way it handles change in any way that we could detect.
After zeroing the red dot at the typical 50 yard zero, we took it up to shoot at some of the longer distances to see how it would feel and perform,
After shooting at 300 yards and on “Q” target and determining that it stabilized the MK 262 load, I then started shooting it at a steel target at 800 yards. The gun was fully capable of getting hits on the plate at 800 with no problem. It was actually easier to hit the plate with the AUG than it was when using an HK417 in 308. The short stiff barrel is very accurate. Match ammo produced 1 MOA groups while M193 gave the typical 2-2.5 MOA groups.
Above, the owner poses beside the steel at 800 to show its size and the hits on the plate from the 5.56 AUGA3. The pate is not the same size as a man, so it is a lot better performance that it seems without being able to see the actual size of the target compared. Once again I want to point out that it is no big deal to shoot beyond 200 yards with a red dot sight despite what gun board experts will claim. The right zero and quality ammo makes it no real feat. In my opinion the RDS with a good zero on a 556 rifle is very close to being the perfect general purpose combo.
Now on to the qualities that really make the AUG stand out to me. This gun is so easy to fire with speed it was a huge surprise to me. The recoil is tame. Tame and flat. When firing the gun during rapid fire drills, it seems that it is like shooting a .22LR. The recoil comes straight back and is very, very light. The gun seems to not rise at all. My first thought on shooting it was how great it would be for run and gun competition, It is like using an AR15 with a really good brake. It is something you have to see for yourself to really enjoy how smooth and soft it is. I would be interested to know what it was like with a sound suppressor on it.
Another thing about this gun that was a surprise to me was how great the trigger turned out to be. It was not light weight, but it broke very clean. Just like the cliched “glass rod.” I would say it had about the same pound trigger as the average AR. but it broke very clean with little creep or just anything that you would expect from a gun like this. Or anything without a match trigger really. This greatly added to the easy of hitting at 800 yards consistently with the rifle.
Reliability was all you could ask for. After a 100 round mag dump, it still worked perfectly. One of the mags my friend brought with the gun was around 20 years old and it worked just like the two new mags that came with it. And those mags are very well made and tough. The ribbed and roughed finished mags are easy to grab and manipulate under speed but do not have a rough low quality look or feel. The ribbing adds to the strength no doubt, and the smoked translucent polymer give you the ability to see the loaded status. One of the mags was the 42 round version and it still felt balances in the gun and gave no trouble. All of the mags also nicely fit in common M16 mag pouched just as you would expect.
The safety is the cross bar type but was not trouble to get used to after a short bit of use. And, it actually seemed really natural after using it a bit. It was located on the stock where it is easy to hit on activate on and off easily. It is no AR15 safety by any means, but it is not something I would even nit pick about.
Now, the downsides. The gun is not ambi. The charging handle is not, and the ejection port would have you eating brass as you fired it when set up for your strong hand. You can have it one way or the other, but no both. Another thing, is you HAVE to wear gloves if you are going to shoot it a lot and fast. We forgot our gloves and we both burned ourselves. It is very easy to put your alternate killing hand too high up on the vertical grip and touch the barrel. Especially if you forget and try to hold the gun like you do the rail on a AR15. The receiver also gets hot as the devil’s butthole as well. Even just letting the gun hang buy sling means you have to be very careful. It being as short as it is, it is very easy to let it touch some part of your upper torso or thighs or have it touch against you when moving or handling something else. I can easily imagine transitioning from the AUG to a handgun and when letting it hang, burn yourself in some places you never want burned. So you have to be careful think about it. But this is mainly training issues that can be worked around and reduced. Like I said above the light placement is also a but if a down side, The light is fine, but being able to turn it on and off without shifting the hand. If a cord is ran for a pressure bad to the VFG, I would be concerned the heat from the barrel and receiver would burn or melt the wiring.
Reloading is not where near as fast as an AR15 thought with practice many have gotten very fast. It is not as natural or ergonomic, but it is something you can train to. While not really a problem it is something to be aware of and needs a very different gun handling skill set on the AUG. The butt stock is also not adjustable like a M4 carbine. This is not so much a problem since everything you would sight through already sets well to the rear by design of the bullpup. But maybe for some one very small, it could possibly affect the ability to manipulate the trigger and safety if wearing body armor. We had no problems with this though.
the AUGA3 is a very fine gun and in my opinion, is a lot better than the tavor, which I loathe. It has a great balance and is very easy to shoot and move with. If you have the hots for a bullpup, this is the only one you will ever hear me recommend. It is a classic for sure and like the AR15 pattern, it has had enough years and combat use behind it to know you are getting a real combat hardened carbine, not some hyped up attempt to be different.
A few weeks ago, Comp-Tac was nice enough to send me some of their product to test and use for our readers. I received the excellent leather belt and the new Flatline kydex holster. http://www.comp-tac.com/product_info.php?products_id=302&osCsid=kehesa4s68c68koa9kd65t8ll1
Having already been a fan and constant user of the Minotaur inside IWB holster, I was excited to get the Flatline. Unlike the Minotaur, the flatline is all Kydex. But the Flatline has the very handy feature of being an inside and an outside the belt holster. Comptac sends with the holster, all the clips and adapters you need to swap it around for whatever need you may have. To use their words on the website “
Flatline Clips: are the most innovative clips on the market. made of durable flexible plastic, these clips hold firmly and securely. The plastic material is flexible enough to withstand bending and twisting without breaking and will be gentle on your belt, clothing and car seats.
The Flatline is shipped with 6 clips: Two Flatline clips, Two offset-Flatline clips and Two standard clips.”
The Flatline and its belt adapting clips, allow you to position the the holster as deep in inside your pants as you would like, or high or low on the belt. Also, you can adjust it for the cant you may like so you can get the exact draw you are looking for. You can also adjust how close the pistol and holster hugs your body. That is a feature I greatly appreciate because it seems most of the time, I can not get a holster tight enough against me to suit my needs. And, kydex being what it is, offers a very fast slick draw and the ability to re-holster the gun without having to worry about the top closing up on you. Like other holster Comptac makes, you can also adjust the holster for retention. A lot of other small companies make great outside the belt kydex holster, but few of them let you adjust the level of retention on it with a simple tool.
The above picture shows the holster with the belt loops for use outside the belt. You order the belt loops for whatever size you want to ensure it is not loose on the belt or too tight. And as can be seen, they can be replaced easily to re-purpose into the inside the belt. You can also see the molding that fits the 1911 like a glove. Nothing on the holster is rough or sharp. I have been wearing it for a little over two weeks and it is very comfortable. The extended portion that protects your skin or shirt from the gun is very welcome. Even if the gun does not hurt me, I like the fact this protects the gun from my sweaty body. Either way it is something I consider very valuable for a do it all hard use CCW holster.
If you are worried the Flatline is some how bigger than other CCW holster Comptac makes, no need to worry. The picture above shows the Flatline beside the Minotaur that I have used for a very long time. The dedicated IWB holster is made from Kydex and leather with the adjustable dept clips and is about as comfy as it can get, But it does not have the versatility of the Flatline. I have even managed to secure the Flatline to a MOLLE “war belt” Using the holes made into its body. It is very easy to adapt to what you need. If you are looking for a holster to fill a lot of roles, and only have enough money to spend on one very high quality do it all holster, the Flatline is what I would recommend for inside and outside, That way you can swap around and find out exactly what you want. At 75.00 dollars, the Flatline is around the same price of most more custom made kydex holster, and cheaper than a lot of the pure custom holster made by companies that aim to make you believe that cater to the more tactical special users and all that hype. It is a great deal and you get great quality from a company that is all about useful, quality products.
the belt I got from CompTac is as good as it gets. I really do not know how else to put it. It is the Kydex reinforced leather gun belt and it is superb. This thing looks great, feels great, works great and is great. It is stiff enough to hold up the heaviest of side arms and anything else you want to attach and it does not roll up or bend and it does not wear out from metal or kydex rubbing against it for hours and hours. I have an older one of these I have had a long while and I think it may be invincible.
You can check out the options on this baby at the link above. You can get it in black or brown and with or without a taper. I like the no taper model myself, in brown. It looks good enough to use anytime and I use it as my belt for just about everything. But make sure you look over the chart about the sizing before you order. You can also get the belt with velcro lining to adapt to some of the other attaching methods.
My camera is not the greatest in the world, but hopefully you can see the heavy duty stitching and high quality workmanship that goes into this belt. It is so good, if the situation becomes desperate enough, I am sure you can take it off and beat a crazy or terrorist to death with it. I could go on and on about this belt, I really feel this is the best belt for the money I have ever seen to not be some kind of highly hand tooled show off belt ( which is not really my cup of tea anyway) or some other type not really practical. The kydex in it makes it just right as far as the stiffness goes. I hold up a full steel 1911 with surefire light and two extra 10 round mag reloads all day all the time, and the belt has shown no wear at all. the icing on the cake is, it stays comfortable with no problems at all. If you can only get one belt for the rest of your life, and can not get one made of pure gold, this is the belt you should get. I know I would.
Once again, I feel Comptac has made a great and versatile holster and I am very thankful they sent me the stuff to try it out. It is always worth the money when you get gear they make and I can assure you, buying Comptac CCW gear is never a mistake.
By now, almost everyone has heard of the HK417 and any serious gun owner and enthusiasts know about the MR762 civilian version of the same rifle. Over the weekend I got to test out the MR762A1, which I will refer to as the HK417 or just “417” for the rest of this review. The gun was tested for accuracy at long range with match ammo and shorter ranges for uses that are ore fitting a ‘battle carbine”, to see how it handles and how easy it is to control when using more speedy and violent manipulations.
The rifle used the extended rail to give the gun more space to mount equipment. It has a harris bipod and Leupold tactical 3x-9x optic in ADM mounts, For the shorter range, the gun was equipped with a Trijicon SRS and the bipods removed.
The rifle was shot at 800 and 300yards using Federal Gold medal match ammo. The 800 yard target was a steel man shaped target with the 300 yard target being a Q target made of cardboard for testing accuracy.
Above picture shows the 417 while firing at the 800 yard target. I found the recoil of the 417 a lot stiffer than I expected. The gun torques when fired and is very noticeable. I had not encountered this amount of recoil and torque from a semi auto AR pattern type rifle from any other models before and was surprised. It was something that took me a couple of mags to get used to. The muzzle blast was also surprising. Being a 16 inch barrel, I expected a certain amount of blast, but it was more than I was ready for. I was told it was partly due to the muzzle device design on the rifle.
The target is man shaped, but obviously considerably smaller than a real person. But once I zeroed the optic for 800 yards was able to keep 8 out of 10 rounds out of the ten round magazine, on target. Both of us shooting it, had the same result. The trigger of the 417 is a two stage trigger and though I would not call it a real “match trigger” like the SSA, it is a lot closer to it than a typical milspec trigger. It gave no problems. It had a little creep in its second stage but it was very useable. Owner intend to replace it with a SSA trigger and I think that is a good idea. If the gun is to be used in the DMR or long range role in a dedicated way, it would be an improvement.
After shooting close to 100 rounds at the 800 yard target I move to the 300 yard target for some accuracy testing to see what kind of groups it would give with the Federal Gold medal match 168 grain ammo.
This target above is representative of the other groups fired at 300 yards. I fired multiple 10 round groups and all looked pretty much the same being 2-2.5 MOA. Other than the two sighting shots, the “record” group is the cluster I circled in the black marker. It is the best group I shot at the 300 yard target. Sorry to say the other pictures blurred, but this is the best group. The three shot clover leaf is obviously pure chance.
Lastly was the close range more rapid firing of the H&K417. This is where I started to have some problems with the gun. I found the gun very hard to control during rapid fire drills. The torque was back in a major way and it just plain kicked. It was hard for me to control and did not just lay flat and let me run it like an M4 carbine like the Colt 901 will let you do. My friend who had more time on the gun got a handle on it much better than me, but still there was no tight little impact zone. He also mentioned the torquing of the gun and the effort it takes.The red dot of course helped, but even with the large view of the SRS, I just plain had trouble keeping it in tight on target. I am by no means new to shooting full power battle rifles and carbines, but this one was a handful. I have never liked the feel of the piston operated AR patterns and this rifle did not make me rethink that in any way.
Above is my friends shoulder after 60 rounds with the 417 doing rapid fire drills. I also suffered bruising from the HK. I had not had this kind of experience with any other 762 AR pattern rifle. I honestly found the gun unpleasant for off hand rapid drills when used in the battle carbine role. I would keep it strictly as a long range rifle.
Now here is the part that will cause many to gasp and call for my head while calling me a liar.
The gun experienced at least 6 instances of failure to feed or other malfunctions. The ammo used was NATO 7.62 spec.
We speculated on the causes of the malfunctions as they only appeared during rapid fire. Mag problems or ammo problems, I do not know for sure. as the gun started to run fine after this happening within 40 rounds fired. After it decided to work fine, the gun was fine. A few time we got it hot enough to smoke the barrel and become to hot to hold even the VFG.
It was a great chance to test the much vaunted HK417 AKA MR762A1 today, and it is an interesting piece. I think for the full on H&K fans they would be happy with the 417, but for its price, I would never buy one or even really recommend it. If it was 2,000 or maybe 2,500 I could maybe see it. It is not as accurate as a Larue by any means, and it just simply can not be run as fast and softly as a Colt LE901. Accuracy of the gun is fine. From what I understand, this is not intended to be a sniper precision rifle, so the performance of the rifle’s accuracy is all you could expect from something without a match barrel. It does very well with the federal gold medal like most quality rifles. If I had to personally rank the 7.62 battle carbine/rifles, I would go in this order. 1. Colt 901. 2, SCAR H and 3. the 417 The OBR and KAC guns I consider more precision guns so they are not on the list of “battle carbines”. That is all my personal opinion and it may be different than yours, so you do not have to get bent out of shape. Like I said above. the 417 is a fine gun, and I am sure the feeding issues may not be the guns fault, but the price asked for it is just not justified. I am sure any real HK fan will be willing to pay for it, but if that does not describe you, but you want a serious 7.62 battle carbine of the new gen, I would take a hard look at some of the other offerings right now until the prices come down on these, Regardless I would never opt for a piston rifle if I had a choice.
If you are like me, you don’t get to the range as often as you want or don’t have the cash to train. You can get some dry fire, magazine reloading, and draw training at home, but safety is always a major concern. There are several products out there to help you with this at home training that reinforces some important fundamental defensive handgun skills. These products can also help you master your trigger control and trigger reset, if you are having those issues. Although these are not the only products, these are some of the products I use in my inert training environment.
High Visibility Training Barrel:
I have purchased several Blade Tech training barrels, to assist in instructing with some training courses at a local range. These barrels are great to replace your live fire barrel for dry fire training and firearm manipulation. They come in numerous manufacture models. You can quickly identify that the firearm has a training barrel in place and since there is no chamber and the barrel is plastic, there is no way to load a live round. This is a great safety product to practice, drawing from your holster, dry fire and fully manipulate the slide.
If you are having a flinch issue, jerking the trigger issue or trigger reset issue, the high visibility training barrel is a good product to safely work those issues out. The barrel will also let you practice slide manipulation and magazine exchanges without worrying about a live round being chambered.
Training barrels are also great inexpensive product for moving around your home safely, while training with your weapon mounted light. You can safely manipulate the controls on your light while negotiating corners, hallways and rooms throughout your home. This will help you practice and gain the skills to move through your home in case of a defensive situation.
Dummy Rounds/Snap Caps:
Dummy rounds are a good safety training product if you want to practice reloads and clearing malfunctions. Dummy rounds will require you to be extremely vigilant that you don’t have live ammunition in the area, with your fully functional firearm. With dummy rounds you can manipulate all aspects of your fully functional firearm without the actual firing of live rounds. You can practice malfunction drills, reloading drills, dry fire drills, exc.
At the range, dummy rounds will also let you set up malfunctions in combination with live ammunition. Once again, since the dummy rounds have a dual purpose, it is very important to make sure live ammunition is not in the area of your inert training environment.
For maximum safety with the most function, the high visibility training barrel is the safest combination. You will only be limited in chambering a dummy round. Depending on the firearm and magazines you are using, you can mark your magazines with aftermarket colored pads or high visibility endplates. I like to change out the endplates on my dedicated Glock inert training magazines, to Glock training orange endplates. I do not use these magazines at the range. These are only on my inert dummy round magazines. If I use dummy rounds at the range, I use my standard carry magazines.