Soviet Female Snipers WW2


One of the worthies over at B-ARFCOM shared this article the other day and much discussion resulted. The stories of Soviet snipers are famous for their huge numbers of supposed confirmed kills. Most of it probably lies. Or to be more polite, propaganda. You would have to be a fool to take their claims at face value. Just look at those Russian generals from the great patriotic war with medals covering their entire front shirt.

Even the most famous Russian sniper of all, Zaytsev was used for propaganda. The often repeated story of his duel with a master German sniper named Koening/Thorvald is complete fantasy. No such German sniper existed. We know because the Germans had no record of him ever existing. And we know how much the Germans love keeping records and accounting for every little thing in the Military. It was spun up by communist propaganda and Zaytsev had no choice in it or he was a liar himself. Probably both. That doesn’t mean he also wasn’t a good sniper so untwist thy panties.

Anyways, the huge numbers of the homely lasses below are very likely as trustworthy as a satan’s lawyer. A more realistic and honest account of the sniper war on the eastern front can be found in Sniper on the Eastern Front: The Memoirs of Sepp Allerberger, Knight’s Cross There is no self glorification in that book despite the title.

No doubt the Soviet’s wreaked hell on German troops with their sniping tactics and the sheer number of snipers they fielded but the Germans got a handle on that pretty quick. Now on to the article about these ostensibly female Russian snipers.

Female snipers of the 3rd Shock Army, 1st Belorussian Front. The ‘Shock’ armies were created with the specific structure to engage and destroy significant enemy forces, and were reinforced with more armored and artillery assets than other combined arms armies. Where necessary the Shock armies were reinforced with mechanized, tank and cavalry formations and units.

First row – Guard Staff Sergeant, VN Stepanova: 20 kills, Guard Sgt JP Belousova: 80 kills, Guard Sgt AE Vinogradova: 83 kills.

Second row – Guard Lieutenant EK Zhibovskaya: 24 kills, Guard Sgt KF Marinkin: 79 kills, Guard Sgt OS Marenkina: 70 kills.

Third row – Guard Lieutenant NP Belobrova: 70 kills, Lieutenant N. Lobkovsky: 89 kills, Guard Lieutenant VI Artamonova: 89 kills, Guard Staff Sergeant MG Zubchenko: 83 kills.

Forth row – Guard Sergeant, NP Obukhova: 64 kills, Guard Sergeant, AR Belyakova 24 kills.

Total number of confirmed kills: 775. Photo taken in Germany, May 4, 1945.

Because of chronic problems in finding the manpower to fulfill military and industrial tasks, the Soviet government recruited some 7.75 million women, of whom 800,000 served in the military. Sniping was a precision role, which many women soldiers performed with expertise. It is estimated that in 1943 there were more than 2,000 female snipers in the Soviet armed forces. Female snipers have been credited with more than 12,000 confirmed kills.

The Soviet Union used women for sniping duties extensively, and to great effect, including Nina Alexeyevna Lobkovskaya and Ukrainian Lyudmila Pavlichenko (who killed over 300 enemy soldiers). The Soviets found that sniper duties fit women well, since good snipers are patient, careful, deliberate, can avoid hand-to-hand combat, and need higher levels of aerobic conditioning than other troops. Women were regarded as having the skills and nerves required for accurate marksmanship. Notwithstanding male skepticism, Major General Morozov, “the father of the sniper movement”, attributed superior female marksmanship to the fact that “a woman’s hand is more sensitive than is a man’s. Therefore when a woman is shooting, her index finger pulls the trigger more smoothly and purposefully”.

The most successful Soviet use of snipers during the Second World War was during their defensive stage of the war (1941–1943), after which the advantage of defense shifted to the German side and German snipers became a real danger to the advancing Soviets. Soviet military doctrine used snipers for providing long-distance suppressive fire and for eliminating targets of opportunity, especially leaders, because during World War II, Soviet military leaders and combat theorists found that military organizations had difficulty replacing experienced non-commissioned officers and field officers during times of war. They also found that the more expensive and less rugged sniper rifles could match the cost-effectiveness of a cheaper assault rifle given good personnel selection, training, and adherence to doctrine.


  1. I don’t trust anything out of any of the “historical accounts”, not without actually doing parallel research to corroborate what you find. To include, actual field archaeology and investigation at the battle sites. There’s too much propaganda in the public written records, especially on the Soviet side, and you only have to look at the crap surrounding the raising of the flag at Iwo Jima to grasp that we’re not much better. For the love of God, they’re still finding out who was actually in the second staged photo session, and it’s been almost sixty damn years…

  2. Communists lie. About everything. If it has a number, if it is supposed to be quantified, don’t trust what a commie gives you. Double-check it.

    This is what had Ronald Reagan saying “Trust… but verify.” When it came to counting nukes, Reagan knew that the commies would lie.

  3. Did the Wehrmacht have a sniper brigade or was it Waffen-SS only?
    Comrade Zaytsev probably had to go along or go to the gulag.
    Enemy At the Gates is still one of the most realistic WWII movies and the epic breakdown of communism at the end where his comrade kommissar sacrifices himself to reveal the major’s location is greatness.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here