LooseRounds.com5.56 Timeline


B&T Tactical Sling

A little while back I was thinking about what sling I should use for my APC9k. I was looking at my pile of slings and while some would have worked fine, none really fit the bill. So I went online and started reading about what slings people were using for SMG and compact pistol calibre carbines.

A variety of slings were talked about, and in the discussion of the B&T guns people said they just used the B&T sling. I looked it up, many places sell it for about $100. Ain’t no way I’m paying that for a sling.

Saw someone say they used the sling that came with their gun. Huh, mine didn’t come with a sling.

Or so I thought, I went back into the packaging and sure enough, there was a sling.

I certainly wouldn’t order this sling for $100, but since I already paid for it(with the gun), I figured I’d use it. When I took a closer look, the sling included with the gun is not the same as their expensive one, but I’m not about to buy their expensive sling, so I’m using this.

It is a simple single point sling. You have a single loop that goes over your head and shoulder. There is a QD buckle for quickly removing the sling. It has extra material and a M buckle so you can adjust the length of the sling.

There is also a little slider so that you can adjust the size of the loop. You can put the sling around your torso, then slide this slider to your torso so that the strap going to the gun stays narrow.

The APC9k comes with a piece of parachute cord looped around the rear sling mount. You attach the HK style snap hook to this cord. This saves wear on the hook and the sling loop.

In my time in the Corps, I saw many a HK style hook used on a SAW sling fail. Twice, I saw where the metal hook wearing on the sling loop end up cutting though the sling loop.

That led me to not have much confidence in HK style sling hooks. But, the SAW is about 17 pounds. The HK style sling loop works just fine on these much smaller and lighter guns.

Is it the perfect sling, no. Are there better slings, yes. But this sling comes in the price of a B&T and it works, so I’m going to use it. The narrow strap does start to dig into your shoulder when you are wearing the gun for a long period of time. A single point sling does allow the gun to flop about a lot when you are moving with out a hand on the firearm. But that is less of an issue with these smaller guns.

You do have to keep paying attention to the muzzle, as it is easier to have the muzzle of these small firearms point at your self then on larger guns.

It works well enough, and I already got it. It’s going to stay on this gun.

Playing with the Colt Accurize Rifle CR6724 over the weekend

I don’t have much of a point with this post. I was out trying some loads I ran across in an old issue of Precision Shooting. Writer Jerry Stordahl has/had a Colt Accurized Rifle and listed some of his loads in the article. He used Winchester 748 and some 60gr. V-MAX bullets to shoot some tiny groups. Did not work in my gun. I played with the charge up and down and changed to nosler ballsitic tips and couldn’t replicate his success at all.

If you are a hand loader you will know that sometimes this can rattle your confidence a little when things that should work, don’t work. So I busted out my own loads of 69 grains Sierra HPBTs with 26.5 grains of Varget and shot a 20 round group at 150 yards just to reaffirm that everything is still right in my personal universe.

I have no idea why the picture is so big

You will notice in the picture above I am using the little adapter that Howard made a couple years ago. It lets you attack a flat block to a picatinny rail to shoot off the bags easier. I have no idea how I ever lived without this thing.

The other thing Is the lower doesn’t have the usual Magpul PRS stock on it. That’s because I swapped lowers with my MK12. I did this because I wanted to shoot the load work ups with the SSA trigger I have in my MK12. The Colt trigger in the gun is a good trigger but it’s just not SSA good when you are trying to shoot the smallest groups possible.

If this gun is new to you, read more about it in the links below.

Colt Releases Revised AR-15 ‘Carbine’ Line of Firearms

Around August of 2019, the internet came alive with second-hand word that Colt wasn’t going to sell their LE-series of AR-15’s to civilian consumers anymore. Many on the internet immediately jumped to the conclusion (incorrectly) that Colt had caved to anti-gun bureaucrats and cut off the civilian market. The reality was that Colt had excess inventory and were back-logged with military and law enforcement orders which was completely consuming their manufacturing capacity. Many believed that Colt was done. Many of us understood that Colt was simply balancing market realities and priorities and that once existing inventories got low and military/le contracts got caught up, Colt would begin production again.

On June 29, 2020 www.guns.com published a short article stating that Colt had announced it was going to start shipping commercial rifles again. You can see the story here: https://www.guns.com/news/2020/06/29/colt-now-shipping-ar-15s-to-consumers-again

After reading the guns.com article, I began watching the retail market and firearms sales sites like Gun Broker looking for the new rifles coming into the market. On October 3rd, 2020 on Gun Broker I saw the first listing for the new Colt AR-15’s. I was surprised to see that during the temporary hiatus from the market, Colt had revamped its AR-15 lower receiver design and manufacturing strategy.

The ‘Carbine’ Lower Appears

In an effort to streamline production and reduce production costs, Colt standardized the lower receiver markings to simply say ‘Carbine Cal. 5.56mm’. Above the text is the renowned ‘Rampant Pony’ that we know and love.

Photograph of the new ‘Carbine’ lower receiver

Many committed Colt AR-15 fans did not receive this lower receiver design change very well. After two to three months in the market, the reduction of ‘character’ in the lower receiver markings continues to draw criticism. Over the years we have become used to seeing rifle specific lower receiver nomenclatures like AR-15A2 Sporter II, AR-15A4, AR-15A4 Lightweight LE Carbine, M4 Carbine and M4A1 Carbine to name a few.

The roll mark on the Colt AR6720 Carbine

To put firearm specific nomenclatures on the lower receivers, Colt had to invest in roll dies for each different nomenclature, had to stop production cycles to change roll dies and replace the roll dies as they wear out. The cost estimates that I have seen for each Colt roll mark die was $90,000 to $130,000. What the cost really is, I do not know. Also during this time, we saw the full implementation of laser engraving on the rifles to replace the roll die process. Using one lower receiver nomenclature design enables Colt to use all of their lower receivers across their entire carbine product portfolio.

I completely understand and support Colt’s decision to eliminate the roll die process and the streamlining of their lower receiver production. The current AR-15, or Modern Sporting Rifle (MSR) market is exceptionally cost competitive. Colt rifles have historically been on the higher side of the civilian market price range. Streamlining lower receiver production and switching from roll dies to laser engraving helps Colt reduce their production cost per rifle and price their products more competitively. My hope with the switch to laser engraving is that perhaps one day we will see more new engraving designs since all it takes is the change of some programming code instead of investment in and maintenance of new roll dies.

As of this writing, I have seen three different ‘Carbine’ lower receiver rifle variations enter the market. The rifles have had the product number changed from the ‘LE’ product prefix to a ‘CR’ prefix. The first carbine that I saw appear, on October 3rd, was the CR6920 carbine.

CR6920 Box Label

The next revised carbine that I saw appear on the market, about ten days ago, was the CR6940.

CR6940 Box Label

And lastly, the CR6920MPS-B (CR6920 MagPul Stock- Black) has been seen for sale for about a week now.

CR6920MPS-B Box Label

Dealers have been posting this information on their websites and auction posts which I assume is verbage provided by Colt or the distributors:

“For 2020, Colt has consolidated all Commercial & LE Rifle rollmarks under one common model naming nomenclature,”Colt Carbine”. This change allows for consistency in manufacturing across current and future rifle builds. Features on this model are identical to the prior LE6920 platform, with the exception of the changed rollmark”.

Prices for these three rifles are all over the place. Some dealers are simply charging suggested retail. Some dealers are charging significantly higher. As an example, I have seen CR6920’s as low as $999.00. The average has been $1199.00 to $1299.00. Some dealers are charging as high as $1999.00 for a simple CR6920 although I doubt anybody is paying that much. Personally, I am excited to see the revision of the AR-15 product line even if it isn’t exactly what we want because this shows us that we at least have some additional production and products to look forward to.

I’m not going to go into any additional details about each carbine in this article. I will discuss details of each more later. I have a CR6920 that is ready for me to pick up at my local FFL so I will write more on it in the coming weeks.

Winchester Model 12 Turned Into HD Shotgun

There are some neat gns out there still to be had. Some need a little bit of work to turn them into something pretty sweet. An B-ARFCOM member found this old Model 12 that has seen better days and turned it into a nifty riot length shotgun for home defense. Below youc an see 1srelluc‘s handiwork.

I found this very distressed 1923 12 ga Winchester Model 12 at the pawn shop and took it home for $150.00 OTD…..Looked like a fun project.

Zero finish left.

It had a bulged barrel about 2.50″ back from the bead.

It was missing the take-down pin/spring and had a stick stuck in it to keep the magazine from rotating and wrapped in electrical tape. Lucky for me I had the parts on hand to fix that. Another stick served as a plug in the mag tube….Tossed that and cleaned the tube good. It was none the worse for wear.

The butt-stock had a crack going from the butt going toward the receiver of about 3″ so I fixed that….Easy fix….LOL….Someone must have been doing butt-stroke drills with it.

The butt-pad was, well, just a damn mess so I took it off and installed a repro Winchester butt-plate on it…..Also a on-hand part. I like the shorter LOP it gave me.

I chopped the barrel to 18.25″ and re-beaded it.

I ended up with a nice solid 6+1 HD shotgun.