There is no shortage of companies in the AR game producing their own grip and each promise improved ergonomics, control, comfort, handjobs, etc. I’ve fallen for the marketing hype a few times and tried most of them over the years in an attempt to find the one grip “to rule them all.” Each initially showed promise but all have been discarded over time for one reason or another.


A Hogue grip circa 2005.  I grew tired of the finger groves and didn’t like the texture of the rubber.


Ergo grip also circa 2005.  Too narrow and oddly shaped.


Magpul MOE grips.  Too/large bulky, they feel like a 2×4 in comparison to some.  I’ve come to feel the same about their front grips.

Most recently I’ve been flirting with the straighter angle grips such as the Magpul K-grip and the BCM Gunfighter.


Magpul K-grip.  Too narrow and small.  I don’t think they allow for very good control of the weapon.


I thought I had a winner in the BCM Gunfighter Mod 0, but as time went on I found I did not like how the straighter angle seemed to give me less leverage on the weapon when maneuvering it strong hand only.

So what have I settled on as the best solution in a world of no perfect solution?

The A1.


In another case of the guys that designed the AR15 getting more right than aftermarket parts peddlers (cough piston AR’s cough) would give them credit for, the A1 is still an excellent choice for a grip. While this is completely subjective, to me the A1 strikes an excellent balance of width and angle, and lacks the finger grove of the A2 that many, including myself, despise. Recently I’ve been using a hybrid A1/A2 grip sourced from Accurate Armory that takes the fingergroveless body of an A1 and combines it with the texturing of an A2.  It will be my go to grip for the foreseeable future.


Like M, I have played around with newer “improved” after market grips for the last few years.  I have never had a problem with the A1/A2 grip that a lot of people say, or claim they do, but I am always one to take a look at newer innovation whether it is worthwhile or not.  In the past decade I have tried many of the same grips M has spoken about as well and found them lacking or jus plain hype and marketing.   I despise the Magpul  MIAD and the cheaper MOE grip.  I also found the rubber Hogue to be more of a pain then any real use  and the ergo variants have never held much  for me. 

When the BCM Gunfighter came out, I took a long look and bought one.  BCM has had some real winners with some incremental ( if not necessary ) improvements lately with the obviously nice  charging handles.  The new grip and its new trendy angle got my interest up so I bought one.


Before  I tried this grip, I was using the Tango Down Battle grip.   Now the TD grip was something I really did  live up to what I wanted.  So, to stop using it was not something I did lightly.  After months of using the BCM grip and its new angle that is in such high regard I found out I simply did not like it.   Yes it does put the trigger finger behind the trigger at a straighter angle. Yes, it does help tuck in the arm a little better. Did it help control recoil or some such?  Not that I could tell.  But, the major problem with the grip for me was just what M touched on.  When I operated the carbine with one hand, I had no leverage.  This was not a small problem either. Without the traditional A1/A2 angle , I could not use the leverage of the grip on the rear of my hand, to support the gun as well.


This was greatly exaggerated when I used my alternate killing hand as seen in the picture above.  With the BCM grip, the carbine felt very, very muzzle heavy. It was like it wanted to flip out of my hand, go muzzle down into the dirt while flipping the stock end over end. No joke. That really was what it felt like I was fighting the gun against.   Now I admit this is a training issue, but why get used to it, or fight it when I already had what I needed in the TD grip or the plain old A2 grip.  I have always liked the finger bump on the A2 grip unlike a lot of people so that’s not an issue for me. But the TD does not have any finger grove anyway.  The TD gives me storage as well so there is not real advantage there either in my mind.   


I gave the BCM grip all the attention and effort that it deserves if for no other reason then the popularity and attention it is getting.  It just did not pan out. The grip angle could be over come with training I am sure. But the same can be said about those who think ( thanks to marketing and high profile trainers) that the old grip is some how a hindrance to proper technique.  The AR15 pattern can have some tweaks to make it easier to use there is not doubt, but they are small tweaks.  Despite gun magazines advert, there is not a lot about the AR15 that the inventors did not get right already and Colt Firearms did not damn near perfect.


A few years back I did the whole grip roulette thing my self.  Went from the A2 to the A1 to rid my self of the finger bump.  Then went from the A1 to the Tango Down grip.  The TD is very nice, but I wish it were it bit wider.  Then went to Magpul, I used the slick front strap and smallest back strap.  When I ended up buying my first suppressor I found that holding up a muzzle heavy firearm with the firing hand was easier with a grip that had that finger bump, so I went back to the A2.  So I went full circle.  Other grips I tried and didn’t like included the Ergo (too narrow), Hogue (too many finger bumps), and CAA (functional, but ugly, felt cheap).


Penetration Testing And Using A Car As Cover Part 2

After the results of shooting through a car on the range with a 5.56 a few weeks ago, I decided to test some more with a variety of rounds.


We used the same car as the 5.56 test and shot the target from the same angles and through the same amounts of barrier.  Those being one door, two doors and through both sides of the rear trunk area.  I did not bother trying to shot through the engine block because it will stop just about anything you can carry and fire not crew served.

The first up was the 9mm round.  The round was a NATO  ball round. The caveat is , it was from a Colt 9mm carbine. This adds significant performance to the 9mm FMJ round.  I do not advise anyone to base the performance of their 9mm handgun on what can be done with a rifle firing the same round.


First up  we fired the 9mm through  both rear doors.



Five rounds where fired from 25 yards. Only two made it through and into the target. Two more holes that seemed to be hits turned out to be fragment from the bullet jacket or car door.

Next we fired form the trunk side to side with the 9mm.


Out of five rounds, two made it through both sides of the trunk.

Last we shot  through one door with the target hidden behind it in the classic “movie cop” positioning.



We thought more would make it through in better shape then before when using the same 9mm  round.


Only two rounds out of five made it through. They did stay on path and hit where aimed.  The other three shredded as frag for one reason or another I have no idea why.


Next we fired the  5.45 round form the AK-74  in all three of the same positions as the 5.56 and 9mm.



Almost all made it through both doors. But as you can see they keyholed. There was not much energy left after they hit the target and did not penetrate the plastic barrel  the target was leaning against. But they did go through both doors and hit where we intended them to hit.  Rounds  were fired through a AK74 “krinkov” with shorter barrel so it would be interesting to see the different from the full length AK barrel.  Range was again, only 25 yards.


The 5.45 was nothing but frag when shot through the trunk/rear of the car with five rounds.


The 5.45 went through the single passenger side door very easy with lots of fragmentation. Most rounds hit were aimed but at odd angles showing  the start of the tumbling seen when fired through two doors resulting in obvious key holes in the target.


Last we fired the 7.62×39.


Two rounds out of five, fired from 25 yards from a AK47 , made it through both doors. The M43 round held together twice but the rest became a fine enough powder to just pepper the target with dents.


When fired through the rear trunk of the car, one round of five made a solid hit, the rest became frag that just made it through the cardboard of the target and made no mark on the plastic barrel behind it that we could spot.


The last 5 rounds were fired through the “movie cop ” one door position.  This had us scratching out heads a bit. Most of the rounds fragmented bad enough to not leave any hole that looked like a clean hit.  Large chunks of the round did puncture the target but only maybe two at most.   Lots of bullet jacket did cut through the target though and would obviously make a bad day.  My guess is that 2-3 rounds tumbled or where deflected off target.  Though, I don’t see how sense that target was only about 5 inches behind the rear of the door we shot through.    Gun was the shorter barreled version so make of that what you will.


Once again this shows that most popular common rounds fired at a car being used as cover will give you a large medical bill or a trip to the grave.  Very little of the vehicle offers up real cover and protection.  All rounds fired  were ball ( FMJ )  and would theoretically give better penetration, but that obviously not a given. The reason we used ball this time, is because it is the most common round to find in all of these rounds and  soviet type arms with ball ammo is the main weapon many people will face in certain parts of the world doing certain jobs.  Do to its cheap price, it is also likely to be the choice of some bad guy wanting more firepower.  Most LE and civilians with ammo for self protection would be more likely to have hollow points or soft points or some such so this time we were more interested in seeing what a person could expect to face in such an encounter.   We will be doing this test with more rounds to come to give an idea  just what you might expect if your day suddenly goes very badly.